Sit Down First

Purgatory and indulgences

Is there a cleansing after death, and can the Church shorten it?

The passage it turns on

According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder I laid a foundation, and another builds on it. But let each man be careful how he builds on it. For no one can lay any other foundation than that which has been laid, which is Jesus Christ. But if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, or stubble; each man’s work will be revealed. For the Day will declare it, because it is revealed in fire; and the fire itself will test what sort of work each man’s work is. If any man’s work remains which he built on it, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned, he will suffer loss, but he himself will be saved, but as through fire.

1 Corinthians 3:10-15In context. Paul to the church in Corinth about its leaders, with a building picture: Christ is the foundation, each worker builds on it, and the day of judgment will test each one’s work by fire. The worker whose work burns is saved, ‘yet as through fire’.

A saved person suffers loss and comes through fire: that is a cleansing after death of someone who is saved, which is what purgatory is. Augustine and Gregory read it so. The loss is real and the salvation is certain; both halves of the sentence matter.

The fire tests work, not persons, and it tests it on “the Day”, the judgment, not in a waiting state. Paul is talking about ministers who build the church in Corinth with poor materials. “Saved as through fire” means barely, like a man who escapes a burning house with nothing.

Press a reading to put the lamp behind the words that side leans on. The passage does not change.

What each side holds

Catholics hold that those who die in God’s grace but still imperfectly purified undergo a purification before heaven, that the living may help them by prayer, and that the Church may grant indulgences, which remit the temporal consequences of forgiven sin. Protestants hold that Christ’s work leaves nothing to be purged, that the believer at death is with the Lord, and that indulgences were the abuse that began the Reformation.

Both sides agree that nothing unclean enters heaven and that sin leaves wreckage behind even when it is forgiven. The question is what God does about that at death.

The points people make

Nothing unclean enters heaven

One of the criminals who was hanged insulted him, saying, “If you are the Christ, save yourself and us!” But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Don’t you even fear God, seeing you are under the same condemnation? And we indeed justly, for we receive the due reward for our deeds, but this man has done nothing wrong.” He said to Jesus, “Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom.” Jesus said to him, “Assuredly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”

Luke 23:39-43In context. The two criminals on crosses beside Jesus: one mocks, the other asks to be remembered, and Jesus answers, ‘Today you will be with me in Paradise’.

Scripture is silent on it. Scripture says nothing unclean enters the new Jerusalem, and promises a repentant thief Paradise that day. It is silent on a cleansing after death.

The Catholic reading

Most believers die forgiven but still attached to sin; they are not ready to see God face to face and not lost either. Purgatory is the mercy that finishes the work, and the Church has prayed for the dead from the catacombs on. Even C. S. Lewis, no Catholic, wanted it.

“but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation.”

Catechism of the Catholic Church 1030

The Protestant reading

Those who die in Christ are already clothed in his righteousness; what remains is not a debt but a transformation, and Scripture places it at the moment of seeing him (1 John 3:2), not in a season of suffering. The thief went to Paradise that day with no time to be purged.

“Besides these two places, for souls separated from their bodies, the Scripture acknowledgeth none.”

Westminster Confession 32.1, 1646

Prayer for the dead in 2 Maccabees

Inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once, and after this, judgment, so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, without sin, to those who are eagerly waiting for him for salvation.

Hebrews 9:27-28In context. The letter to the Hebrews: men are appointed to die once, and after that judgment; Christ was offered once and will appear a second time.

Scripture is silent on it. Hebrews says “it is appointed for men to die once, and after this, judgment”, and names no interval. 2 Maccabees, Scripture for Catholics and not for Protestants, records Judas having sacrifice offered for fallen soldiers so that they might be freed from their sin; it shows prayer and sacrifice for the dead, and names no place of cleansing.

The Catholic reading

Judas Maccabeus has sacrifice offered for fallen soldiers, and the writer calls it “a holy and pious thought” to pray for the dead that they might be freed from sin. The book is Scripture for Catholics and shows what faithful Jews did two centuries before Christ.

“that there is a Purgatory, and that the souls there detained are helped by the suffrages of the faithful”

Council of Trent, Session 25, decree on purgatory, 1563

The Protestant reading

The soldiers had died wearing pagan amulets, in idolatry, which Catholic teaching itself says purgatory does not cover. The book is not in the Hebrew canon, and Jesus and the apostles never quote it. It records a practice; it does not teach a doctrine.

“The books commonly called Apocrypha, not being of divine inspiration, are no part of the canon of the Scripture”

Westminster Confession 1.3, 1646

Forgiveness in the age to come

“He who is not with me is against me, and he who doesn’t gather with me, scatters. Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven men. Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, neither in this age, nor in that which is to come.

Matthew 12:30-32In context. Jesus, after the Pharisees say his power is from Beelzebul: every sin and blasphemy may be forgiven, except blasphemy against the Spirit, ‘neither in this age, nor in that which is to come’.

Scripture is silent on it. Jesus speaks of a sin never forgiven, in this age or the next. Scripture is silent on other sins being forgiven after death; Catholic writers use it as a hint, not a proof.

The Catholic reading

Jesus says one sin will not be forgiven “in this age, nor in that which is to come”, which Gregory the Great took to imply that some sins are forgiven after death. The parable of the debtor who will not get out until he has paid the last penny points the same way.

“As for certain lesser faults, we must believe that, before the Final Judgment, there is a purifying fire.”

Gregory the Great, quoted in Catechism 1031

The Protestant reading

Jesus is saying the sin is never forgiven, in the strongest idiom he had. The debtor is a warning about settling with a brother now. Building an afterlife doctrine from the shape of an idiom is the kind of reading both sides reject elsewhere.

“The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory, Pardons,”

Thirty-nine Articles, Article 22, which calls it a thing vainly invented, 1571

Absent from the body, present with the Lord

Therefore we are always confident and know that while we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight. We are courageous, I say, and are willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be at home with the Lord. Therefore also we make it our aim, whether at home or absent, to be well pleasing to him. For we must all be revealed before the judgment seat of Christ; that each one may receive the things in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad.

2 Corinthians 5:6-10In context. Paul to the Corinthians on death: to be away from the body is to be at home with the Lord, and all of us will be revealed before the judgment seat of Christ for what we did.

Scripture is silent on it. Paul expects to be “at home with the Lord” when he leaves the body, and elsewhere calls departing to be with Christ “far better” (Philippians 1:23). Scripture is silent on any interval between.

The Catholic reading

Paul is sure he will be with Christ; purgatory is not instead of that but on the way to it, and it is not measured in earthly time. A soul in purgatory is saved, loves God, and is being made ready to see him. Nothing in Paul rules out a purification.

The Protestant reading

Paul expects to be with Christ at once, calls it far better, and never warns the Corinthians or Philippians of a fire between. If a doctrine this heavy were true, the apostle who wrote most about death would have said so somewhere.

“it is the man's work that will be evaluated by fire and placed in the fire, not the man.”

TurretinFan, Alpha and Omega Ministries, 2010

Indulgences, then and now

by which will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. Every priest indeed stands day by day serving and often offering the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins, but he, when he had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down on the right hand of God; from that time waiting until his enemies are made the footstool of his feet. For by one offering he has perfected forever those who are being sanctified. The Holy Spirit also testifies to us, for after saying, “This is the covenant that I will make with them: ‘After those days,’ says the Lord, ‘I will put my laws on their heart, I will also write them on their mind;’” then he says, “I will remember their sins and their iniquities no more.” Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.

Hebrews 10:10-18In context. The same letter: the old priests stood offering daily sacrifices that could never take away sins; Christ offered one sacrifice for all time and sat down, and ‘there is no more offering for sin’.

Scripture is silent on it. Hebrews says that where sins are forgiven there is no more offering for sin. Scripture is silent on indulgences.

The Catholic reading

An indulgence remits the temporal effects of sins already forgiven, drawn from Christ’s merits applied by the Church; it never forgives sin and cannot be bought. Trent banned all sale of indulgences in 1562, and Paul VI reformed the practice in 1967. The abuse was real and the Church ended it.

“An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven”

Catechism of the Catholic Church 1471

The Protestant reading

Luther’s 95 Theses began with Tetzel selling release from purgatory for coins, and the deeper objection stands after the reform: the Church claims to administer a treasury of merit, which puts a human office between the sinner and the finished work of Christ.

“Any truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence letters.”

Luther, the 95 Theses, thesis 36, 1517

Watch

One talk from each side, chosen for making its own case well. Each loads from YouTube only when you press play.

Catholic Answers Live. 7 min. Jimmy Akin on where Catholics find purgatory in the Bible, in seven minutes. Open on YouTube
Gavin Ortlund. 77 min. Gavin Ortlund traces how the doctrine of purgatory developed and why Protestants reject it. Open on YouTube

Sources on this page

Every quotation above, with the page it comes from and the day it was read. Primary documents first where a side has one.